Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8521 - 8540 of 21,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2017, 10:13 am by Eugene Volokh
The same principle, the court held, applies here: Section 230(c)(1) prevents courts from entertaining civil actions that seek to impose liability on defendants like Facebook for allowing third parties to post offensive or harmful content or failing to remove such content once posted. [read post]
19 May 2017, 5:39 am by Moll Law Group
When someone suffers injuries as a result of a defective or dangerous product, the potential defendants that may be held liable range from the company that designed the product to the manufacturer and even the retailer. [read post]
19 May 2017, 5:39 am by Moll Law Group
When someone suffers injuries as a result of a defective or dangerous product, the potential defendants that may be held liable range from the company that designed the product to the manufacturer and even the retailer. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:20 pm
 Who's the proper party where the decedent was protected by the insurance? [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:51 pm by Liisa Speaker
Defendants Walker, Willis and Voight moved for summary disposition under MCR 2.116 (C)(10) asserting they couldn’t be found liable for the accident because Reid was more than 50% at fault. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:31 pm by Christopher Simon
Following the plaintiff’s reply to the motion, the court ruled in the defendant hospital’s favor, holding that the claims were time-barred and did not relate back to the original complaint. [read post]
17 May 2017, 12:34 pm by Neumann Law Group
The court held that paying consideration in exchange for permission to enter recreational property nullified immunity under section 846 for anyone potentially liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:54 am by Neumann Law Group
Absent gross negligence, the defendants contended that the Township could not be held vicariously liable. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:00 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Ultimately, the court determined that the plaintiff did effectuate proper service on the government defendant and rejected the defendants appeal. [read post]
17 May 2017, 8:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Indian tribes may soon be defending a rise in individual capacity suits against nonmember tribal employees. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:25 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
When a driver runs a stop sign and causes an accident, that driver may be held liable for any injuries that occur as a result. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:06 am by Neumann Law Group
The other defendants argued that they had no duty to the plaintiff because they were not liable for the negligence of an independent contractor they hired. [read post]
The lawyer’s legal team persuaded the trial court, however, that the much larger cab company was liable too. [read post]
15 May 2017, 11:30 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
Circuit court denied estate’s motion for summary judgment, finding there were genuine issues of material fact in dispute as to whether defendants negligence proximately caused plaintiff’s crash. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:01 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  Basically, it’s a claim that defendant knew their product was harmful and kept it a secret, because they wanted to make money selling the product. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:57 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Simply stated, the element of causation requires that a plaintiff prove that the defendants actions were the cause of their injuries. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:39 am
Borrowers commonly defend themselves by claiming that lenders acted unfairly when issuing the mortgage or collecting the debt. [read post]