Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 8521 - 8540 of 57,375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2010, 10:05 pm by Walter Olson
Other recent developments: a regional newspaper chain of which the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette is the best-known unit has apparently signed on as a second major client with RightHaven [“We’re up to our armpits in Righthaven defendants,” a referral coordinator for the Electronic Frontier Foundation says; Wired] TechDirt looks into the question of why the company demands the domain names of groups it sues. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:27 pm by Venkat
Until 2009 I used the name “Quick and Easy Moving” for my moving business and was ordered to cease using that name because it wasconfusingly similar to another more senior business, “EZ Moving and Storage. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:33 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” As to defendant Boyer (the relevant defendant), the class actions alleged that it falsely designated the  geographic origin of its coffee with the intent to deceive, when the products actually contained little to no Kona coffee. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 4:37 am
Collectively these companies were the defendants in this action. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
The defendants’ other ties to Virginia (or the US more generally): The domain names are registered with GoDaddy (a tie to the US, not Virginia). [read post]
5 Dec 2005, 5:00 am
As an example of the latter scenario, the Board granted summary judgment to defendant Onfolio, Inc. because the marks ONFOLIO and CARTAGIO (for computer software) are too different to support a likelihood of confusion claim. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:16 am by Chijioke Okorie
While Morison branded its medicine with the generic “PARACETAMOL”, with reference to its registered trademarks “MSJ” and “MORISON” on the packaging, CPL used the name “CONPHAMOL”. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 4:01 am
Man’s Day Publ’g Co., 205 USPQ 470, 473-74 (TTAB 1980).Acquiescence requires proof of three elements, namely that: (1) plaintiff actively represented that it would not assert a right or a claim; (2) the delay between the active representation and assertion of the right or claim was not excusable; and (3) the delay caused defendant undue prejudice. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 4:10 pm by Adam Baker
A few years in it seems that the Defendant offered to settle for $7000. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 4:10 pm by Adam Baker
A few years in it seems that the Defendant offered to settle for $7000. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:25 am by Milord A. Keshishian
Defendant Lau filed a motion for partial summary judgment that it did not infringe A’lor’s copyrights and Defendant Miami Lakes filed a motion regarding the trade dress infringement claims, which motions were joined by several defendants. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:36 pm by Samuel Goldberg
Mills also explained that he is not releasing the Defendant’s name because he has not yet been charged. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:03 am
  Plaintiff claimed that it had invented defendants' patented inventions before defendants. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:58 am by David
 The Massachusetts firm initially represented the defendant, but then was named as a defendant. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:25 am by Michael Lowe
  This rule also requires the government to respond by giving the defense lawyer all names and addresses of any witnesses the prosecutor may use to rebut that alibi defense (e.g., putting the defendant at the scene of the crime, or witnesses who challenge the alibi witnesses’ testimony). [read post]