Search for: "State v Richards" Results 8521 - 8540 of 9,003
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2007, 1:36 am
[UPDATE: I'm informed by a knowledgeable and trusted source that I may have wrongly attributed the uncovering of the wind-water protocol to the Rigsby sisters, and that attorney Richard "Flip" Phillips of Batesville found this document in the case of Guice v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 1:20 pm
There's no judge quite like the Seventh Circuit's Richard Posner. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
On Nov. 19, circuit judges Henry Lackey, Robert Elliott and Andrew Howorth all told the state Supreme Court they would "awate" the appointment of a special judge to take on the case, Jones v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:30 am
Rossmiller also analyzes the underlying Jones v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 5:23 am
" Richard Shea an attorney in Connecticut who publishes the Connecticut Estate Planning & Elder Law Blog has a good description of each and the differences in an article titled Power of Attorney v Conservatorship. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:35 am
Richard began by stating that he does not believe the case has changed the law. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (PRA)Via the University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog we are directed to Richard Epstein's column at the Financial Times (FT.com) website which views the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (PRA) as A dangerous one-two punch, arguing that changes to rules on patent-based injunctions and patent infringement damages would dampen patent innovation.As far as injunctions are concerned, Epstein points to the standard voiced by the US Supreme Court holding in eBay… [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:17 am
O'Brien's and 02138's real sin is this classically wobbly nut graf:The media have mostly glossed over ConnectU Inc. v. [read post]