Search for: "State v. FIELDS" Results 8521 - 8540 of 12,938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 11:51 am by Kirk Jenkins
United States, which involved the question of whether fleeing from the police in a car was a violent felony, and Graham v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:29 am
The U.S. attorney for Florida's Southern District and the FBI’s Miami Field Office jointly announced the indictment in Miami and painted a picture of a crafty criminal conspiracy. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:34 am
Act and present Singur Act come within the same field i.e. within the Entry 42 of List III. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 7:12 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
This group includes a wide assortment of students, scholars, trainees, interns, teachers, professors, researchers and research assistants, or leaders in a field of specialized knowledge or skill. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
Problems that are formulated in this way (even when stated “as an aim to be achieved in a non-technical field”) inappropriately suggest that the underlying invention relates to excluded “as such”, i.e. non-patent eligible, subject-matter. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Statements of President Obama  made today (June 22, 2012) in celebration of the 13th anniversary of the June 22, 1999 Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:26 pm
In the above referenced Tampa Bay Times article, Samantha Hunter Padgett, deputy general counsel for the Florida Retail Federation, states that "The law reintroduces fairness and creates a level playing field for businesses and customers. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm by Karel.Frielink
Whenever this is the case, the state is at the same time a major market player and an arbitrator. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Charon QC
They will not only overturn centuries of common law fair trial protections for those seeking to challenge the actions of the State, but also undermine the vital constitutional principle that no one is above the law, including the Government. [read post]