Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 16,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2014, 7:44 am
Lest we forget, traditional rational basis review was the standard applied in Plessy v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:58 am
Diane Webber, a British lawyer who recently did a lengthy study of detention law in a variety of countries, writes in with the following account of the European Court of Human Rights decision earlier this month in Hassan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:40 am
Five years after Kemp, in a case called Ingle v Glamore Motor Sales, Inc., the same court rejected a minority shareholder’s contention that his status as such exempted him from the at-will employment doctrine and allowed him to seek a remedy for wrongful termination of his employment. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 4:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:32 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:01 pm
The application (DeWine v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
CPL 720.35(2) is not to be construed as but a minor obstacle to be easily overcome by the plaintiff as it seeks to cast aside the statutory protection afforded to the appellant. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
In Ohio State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:01 pm
In Plascencia v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:40 am
(See prior posting.)UPDATE: Here is the full opinion in Costanza v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
It was also important to give leeway to minority members to express their views. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 12:44 pm
Morgan V. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 2:15 am
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:49 am
In today’s case (Gillespie v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 5:48 am
Khalil Bell v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
R., a Minor 13-1547Issue: Whether operation of a “stay-put” provision in 20 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
” Adams v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
The PDA was necessitated by a Supreme Court decision two years earlier, General Electric v. [read post]
