Search for: "State v. Price" Results 8521 - 8540 of 13,227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm by Mark Litwak
Study on the impact of State Blue Sky laws on Regulation A offerings.TITLE V--PRIVATE COMPANY FLEXIBILITY AND GROWTHSec. 501. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:33 am by Travis Crabtree
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals may have provided trademark owners a little hope in its decision in Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:33 am by Travis Crabtree
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals may have provided trademark owners a little hope in its decision in Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:26 am
The Claimant objected, and stated that any substitution would be subject to approval by the Recipient. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:49 pm by Kevin Funnell
” Moreover, the DOJ’s reliance on discretionary loan pricing by individual loan officers as evidence of intentional discrimination seems to be squarely contrary to the Supreme Court’s observation in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
Market prices won't do as a proxy for utility, for a variety of reasons including wealth effects. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 5:06 am by SHG
Justice Kennedy thinks the price is worth it. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm by David Ettinger
On May 1, 2, and 3, the court will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): United Teachers of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
, Taxes and Priorities, R.I.P., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
Titles V and VI - Relaxation of mandatory Exchange Act registration standard for record holders Increases number of record holders triggering mandatory registration to 2,000, no more than 500 of which may be unaccredited Excludes holders of employee benefit plan securities Increases thresholds for bank holding companies Implementation: Effective immediately. [read post]