Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 11,377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
California Court of Appeal, 03/22/2011 People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
The Commissioner also initiated rulemaking at the request of the Corporations Committee of the Business Law Section of the California State Bar to create a non-exclusive safe harbor for associated persons of issuers. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:31 pm
Indeed, any court that sought to utilize a less probing analysis (per se or quick look) would have to confront the Supreme Court’s California Dental decision, which held that a pretty doggone naked restraint among competing dentists was entitled to a full rule of reason analysis because it could enhance competition by reducing fraudulent advertising. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:26 am
The Court of Appeal started with an overview of the law on spoliation of evidence since the seminal California Supreme Court cases of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:26 am
Now both mayors have court orders barring their illegal activity. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
In a pro-business decision, the Los Angeles Superior Court Appellate Division recently established state standards for damages and standing for California public accessibility cases in Mundy v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
The Ninth Circuit Court refused on Wednesday to lift its temporary order that bars same-sex couples from getting married in California while that appeals court is weighing the constitutionality of Proposition 8, forbidding such unions. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:23 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:17 pm
California is considered a no-fault divorce state, meaning the reason a couple is divorcing is completely irrelevant to the court in whether the court will grant a divorce. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:57 pm
The amount claimed which may be stated in general terms whether the claim would be in the jurisdiction of the limited civil court (less than $25,000.00) or within the jurisdiction of the unlimited civil court (greater $25,000.00). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:58 am
Supreme Court in connection with Morrison v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
Walthers, Inc (Docket Report) (Gray on Claims) District Court C D California: Falsely advertising compliance with patented method constitutes false marking: King Tuna v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:31 am
LEXIS 24395 (SD CA, March 9, 2011), a California federal district court permitted an inmate to proceed with his claim that prison officials destroyed his religious books.In Washington-El v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:39 am
The Department continues to administratively prosecute those who engage in such fraud and to work in collaboration with the California State Bar, the Federal Trade Commission, and federal, State and local criminal law enforcement authorities to bring such frauds to justice. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
In response, Maremont argued that she could also state claims for intrusion into seclusion and false light. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
Q: As proposed, guidelines would wipe out a great deal of advertising—only 100% fruit juice would be allowed; no peanut butter and jelly, some yogurts would be barred. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
Officials in Arkansas and California said authorities have not seized their supplies. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
Tenn., and 34 other states, joined an amicus brief [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:32 am
It found that the juror did not show “state law either procedurally or substantively bars presentation of his claims to the California Supreme Court” and that the juror did not contest the other two prongs of the Younger doctrine in that there was a pending state court proceeding that implicated important state interests. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
JacksonDocket: 10-797Issue(s): Whether a ruling by the court of appeals on habeas, reversing a district court's decision and finding a state pro [read post]
