Search for: "U.S. v. Mark" Results 8521 - 8540 of 11,355
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm by cdw
The next edition  has two really notable opinions, Mark Breakiron v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Apple v Samsung v Apple v Samsung v Apple....Last year the AmeriKat was constantly up-to-date reporting on the latest of the patent mobile phone wars. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
., Office of the United States Trustee, Brooklyn, NY, Mark Bruh, Esq., Law Offices of Robert L. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm by Marie Louise
(Patently-O) District Court E D Pennsylvania: References to patents in website’s “terms of use” and online product manuals do not constitute false marking: Hollander v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The U.S. amendment called for deletion of the phrase “, or by statute” at the end of para. 7(a) of art. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am by clayton
Instead, the officers called for backup, and four additional officers arrived on the scene in two marked cruisers. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:01 am by Bexis
Supreme Court case, Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm by Marie Louise
Enterasys Networks (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court C D California: Fraud theory in parallel litigation defeated by patent reissue: U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:41 pm by Michael Atkins
In short, Louboutin’s Red Sole Mark needs to have secondary meaning if it’s to be protected under U.S. trademark law as a color mark. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
The "C" trade mark and insignia is on several of Coach's signature lines of bags, wallets, belts, shoes, hats, scarves and the lining therein and was registered as a U.S. trade mark in September 2002. [read post]