Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 8521 - 8540 of 51,308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
” A leading case setting out this principle: Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 7:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Greenberg v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 6:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
So, under the statute, posting a comment to a newspaper article — or a blog — saying that the article or post author is “fucking out of line” would be a crime: It’s said with intent to offend, it uses an electronic or digital device, and it uses what likely will be seen as profane language (see, e.g., City of Columbia Falls v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
, or it could be by other more general means such as advertising or instructions given to doctors, in which case infringement might be found even with a skinny label. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:36 pm
Using evidence of search terms used on 18 September 2012, the expert was able to link the images on the `G drive’ to the laptop computer. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am by Sharon Armstrong
A few weeks ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in The University of South Carolina v. the University of Southern California in South Carolina’s appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). [read post]