Search for: "Young v. State" Results 8521 - 8540 of 8,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 6:20 am by INFORRM
There are two judgments : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) and A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020). [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm by Amy Howe
In 1975, Ginsburg argued at the Supreme Court on behalf of Stephen Wiesenfeld, who wanted to obtain Social Security benefits that would allow him to stay home with his young son after his wife, a schoolteacher, died in childbirth. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm by Patricia Hughes
Round Two: rehearing by the AHRC; an appeal from the AHRC’s 2020 decision (Amir and Siddique v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:05 pm by Erin Miller
  In one of his opinions for the Court, Heckler v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Andres
I’ve just finished reading the fascinating case of AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) via the IP Osgoode blog. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 10:45 am
"How would you describe your relationship with Nina, after she got here to the United States? [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Or perhaps college campuses are special places where those in charge should be especially careful not to unduly influence young minds reaching maturity. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]