Search for: "A P.2."
Results 8541 - 8560
of 26,627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2019, 11:19 am
Where the Money Goes: Understanding Litigant Expenditures for Producing Electronic Discovery (p. xiv, xv). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:11 pm
A ministra julgou prejudicado o pedido, no que se referia ao item 1 do parágrafo 2º do artigo 10 da referida Constituição, o qual estabelecia voto público especificamente no julgamento desses crimes, pois a norma já havia sido revogada. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:10 am
American Brands, Inc., 16 P.3d 435 (Nev. 2001). [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:09 am
., 01-1670, p.2 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/3/02)). [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:08 pm
A denúncia foi apresentada pelo Ministério Público Federal em 16 de dezembro de 2010, na véspera da diplomação da deputada. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 11:58 pm
[Recall Pfizer bought Warner-Lambert in 2000 for $116 billion to get patent rights on Lipitor.]Drago Sliskovic is co-inventor on US 4,735,958 [issued 5 April 1988], titled Trans-6-[2-[2-(substituted-phenyl)-3- (or 4-) heteroaryl-5-substituted-1H-pyrrol-1-yl]-ethyl]tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-2H-p yran-2-one inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis, which in the background of the invention notes:High levels of blood cholesterol and blood lipids are conditions involved in… [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 9:08 pm
Jhung, MD, Karen P. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:39 pm
Pape.[2] In that case, the Court articulated three purposes that underlay the statute: "1) 'to override certain kinds of state laws'; 2) to provide 'a remedy where state law was inadequate'; and 3) to provide 'a federal remedy where the state remedy, though adequate in theory, was not available in practice.'" Blum & Urbonya, Section 1983 Litigation, p. 2 (Federal Judicial Center, 1998) (quoting Monroe v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
2 Fed. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 1:17 pm
Já podem ser acessadas na home page do Tribunal as estatísticas processuais de 1ª e de 2ª instâncias. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 8:59 am
Section 230(c)(2)(A). [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 3:01 pm
Finally, after [they] exchanged Chapters 2 and 5, Craig wrote Chapter 3 in response to Sinnott-Armstrong's Chapter 2, and Sinnott-Armstrong constructed Chapter 6 as a reply to Craig's Chapter 5. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:24 am
April 2, 2010). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:29 pm
Source: L. 2011: Entire section added, (SB 11-134), ch. 261, p. 1139, § 2, effective July 1, 2011 . [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:20 am
Hoffman, 149 N.J. 564, 577 (1997) (quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:2-2(b)(1)). [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 7:32 am
L.Rev. 43, 66 [ evidence admitted solely to form the basis of an expert's opinion under [Federal Rules of Evidence] Rule 703 will not support a prima facie case ]; 2 McCormick on Evidence, supra, § 324.3, p. 373 and fn. 8 [same]. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 1:21 am
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Stuttgart (Germany), to be dealt with through the accelerated procedure, was lodged on 16 June 2010 in case C- 296/10 (Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez, noch ein mal). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 3:54 am
Meanwhile, Katten Muchin's Claudia Allen has put together this report for The Conference Board that examines the trends in exclusive forum bylaw adoption since the Chevron/Fed Ex cases in June '13 to the end of October '13, finding: Companies adopted (the report contains a list): - 112 Delaware companies adopted or have announced they will (19 were S&P 500 companies), 18 Maryland companies or REITs, 4 in PA, 2 in Nevada, 2 in Oregon and 1 each in Florida, S. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:37 am
P. 26(b)(3). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:45 pm
Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11040, subd. 2(P).) [read post]
