Search for: "B. N. S."
Results 8541 - 8560
of 16,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
It’s the most important victory for the anti-mandate advocates so far. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
Torres, 435 U.S. 1, 4 n. 6. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:12 pm
First, you’ll enter your name (as indicated by the 1 in the blue circle), along with any D/B/A or trade name. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Here, said the court, in a case concerning an employee's bumping rights under the Civil Service Law, Matter of Hughes v Doherty, 5 NY3d 100, the Court of Appeals ruled that "judicial review of [the Commission's] classification system and determinations are limited to whether there was a rational basis for the agency's conclusion.... [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:56 pm
N. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
Finley, 477 F.3d 250, 260 (III) (B), n.7 (5th Cir. 2007); see also United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 5:24 am
” (A similar jurisdiction argument was made in the amicus brief filed by Professor Alan B. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:00 am
“E os escritórios de advocacia não são capazes de dar uma resposta clara”, afirmou. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
George B. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
George B. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:01 am
On Tuesday, in PhillyDeals: Private toll roads are on their way back, Joseph N. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:43 am
Supp. 2d. 304, 318 n.15, S.D.N.Y.In Stoneridge, the Court ruled that secondary non-speaking actors said to have participated with a company in a securities fraud scheme were not liable in a private action under Rule 10b-5 since the acts of suppliers said to have participated in the fraud were too remote to satisfy the antifraud rule's reliance requirement. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
Supp. 3d 650 (D.N.J. 2017).The court’s analysis in Dandong Old N. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:09 am
Over the state’s objections, the defense called the defendant’s prior trial counsel to testify at the retrial and impeach the state’s witnesses’ testimony. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 11:11 pm
Under FRCP 16(b), the court held, “[n]ot a circuit court in the country, so far as we can tell, would allow a district court to amend its scheduling order under these circumstances. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:09 pm
Já quanto à ex-funcionária da SMP&B Geiza Dias, o ministro votou pela absolvição. [read post]
MIORELLI DOCTRINE’S SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS — NOT THE BE-ALL AND END-ALL
13 Mar 2022, 6:57 am
See also Asbritt, n.2 quoting Posen Construction v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 6:59 am
C’est pourquoi il bénéficie d’une protection spéciale depuis 1981. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 6:58 am
Só não se sabe ainda exatamente o quê. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
S. [read post]
