Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 152,576
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2023, 3:22 am
For M-1 students, per 8 CFR 214.2(m)(9)(v), this means: No on-line or distance education classes may be considered to count toward an M-1 student’s full course of study requirement if such classes do not require the student’s physical attendance for classes, examination or other purposes integral to completion of the class. [read post]
26 May 2023, 3:19 am
Yet it did in Tyler v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
A court’s review of a decision of the Commissioner of Human Rights is not whether the court would have reached the same result but was the Commissioner's determination rational in light of the evidence presented A court's review of a college’s or university’s disciplinary action against a student limited to whether it complied with its own rules in the process A public school district is not an "education corporation or association" within the… [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
A court’s review of a decision of the Commissioner of Human Rights is not whether the court would have reached the same result but was the Commissioner's determination rational in light of the evidence presented A court's review of a college’s or university’s disciplinary action against a student limited to whether it complied with its own rules in the process A public school district is not an "education corporation or association" within the… [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:40 pm
And, as I noted earlier, Walter Nixon v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:58 pm
The Alford plea is a relatively recent development in criminal law, dating back to a 1970 Supreme Court decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
Today, in Sackett v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
The Takings Clause does not itself define property. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:49 am
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:22 am
" The only case on the subject, Perry v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:14 am
" In Sealed Plaintiff v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am
[1] Appendix V of the Regulatory Program of the United States Government, April 1, 1992–March 31, 1993 The post Circular Reasoning? [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am
They pointed out that in the recent case of Google v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit applied the test outlined by Justice Anthony Kennedy in Rapanos v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:32 am
What Does This Mean? [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
"] From C.M. v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 7:31 am
” The case, Buhuceanu and Others v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:18 am
The DPC reiterated that derogations to the GDPR data export limitations must respect the “essence” of fundamental rights and that, where a derogation does not, it must be considered invalid. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:31 am
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 4:10 am
In Sangervasi v. [read post]
