Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
Inwood v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:41 am
The Libel Reform Campaign say that English libel law allows too many companies and individuals to silence their critics and suppresses freedom of speech. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:23 am
RONNING and KELLY DENNEHY, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm
.- Any fan of international soccer, particularly English football, will find Roger Bennett's recent piece on ESPN.com fascinating. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:25 am
Nothing that happened today proves the DEA makes sense or is right - merely that one judge thinks it does not violate any supranational laws.ps is there really no English translation of SABAM yet other than a Google translation? [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:13 am
Potts v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The contract was governed by English law and provided for arbitration in Singapore. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of either of the countries within the jurisdiction of which the crime or offense was committed, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Michel V. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm
Further, as Rosalind English reports, the UK judiciary’s relationship with the Strasbourg judiciary is not always plain sailing. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:06 pm
Under English law, the "continued existence" today of a prior passing off right doesn't require use today. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
., v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:05 pm
District Court, Eastern District of California (EEOC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
District Court, Eastern District of California (EEOC v. [read post]
