Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 16,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2014, 3:07 pm
Moreover, the hope is to advance the contemporary debate by showing that a post-secular world requires a fundamental reworking of conceptions of law and human rights rather than minor adjustments to the prevailing contemporary views. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 2:49 am
I'm not going to do the usual preview post listing patents, products etc. before the trial in the second Apple v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 11:58 am
The defendant in Parkinson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:30 am
” Great, a new unfunded federal mandate, but at least this time they are stating it will be costly to transition.Needless to say, the medical community is doing cartwheels over a possible delay. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Numerous cases decided in the wake of Massarano, in both New Jersey state and federal court, including the much publicized White v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Even if you do not live in Massachusetts, if you are caring for an elderly loved one and may or may not be an heir apparent, there is something to be learned from a recent case in the Bay State, Cheney v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 11:56 am
Discusssion with staff reflected that there had been some shortage and that one dorm lost both the JCO V and VI" (which are supervisory positions)." [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:54 am
This, of course, advances the idea of global citizenship in the hope of expanding the possibility of catalyzing civic engagement that transcends clearly defined boarders, while r [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm
(JUSTICES: Lord Hope (Deputy President), Lord Walker, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, and Lord Carnwath) The post Joint Administrators of Heritable Bank plc (Respondent) v The Winding-Up Board of Landsbanki Islands hf (Appellant) (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 13 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:52 am
In Wang v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:46 am
Verrilli begins ponderously and the Chief Justice scampers right in to trip him up:GENERAL VERRILLI: The touchstone for resolving this case is the principle Justice Jackson articulated in Prince v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
In connection with the Apple v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 pm
decision by the Supreme Court of Texas in Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:13 am
In earlier decisions, courts have upheld the law.But that was before United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
"Listen, I wrote Martin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:05 am
In Philip Abi-Najm, et. al, v Concord Condominium, LLC, several condominium purchasers sued Concord under for breach of contract, breach of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VCPA) and for fraud in the inducement based upon flooring that Concord installed that was far from the quality stated in the purchase contract. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:16 am
The ObamaCare subsidies challenge, Halbig v. [read post]
