Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 19,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm
Travis testified that the arrangement ultimately “didn’t work out” and ended approximately nine months later.1 Hammond, however, disputed Travis’s characterization of their arrangement. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The Case and the Decision After his appointment as City Manager for Port Huron, Michigan, James Freed expanded the use of his “public” Facebook page to post about not only personal matters but also about matters related to his public office. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
And we haven’t even gotten to fair use yet. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
But that ain’t necessarily so. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
He isn’t wrong. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 10:04 am
But just because I don’t know what it means, that doesn’t mean it matters. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am
, legal matters, contractual information ... private social life, personal lifestyle, [or] private conduct. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
§ 1292(b). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:24 am
& Anthony T. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:06 am
§78fff(b). [read post]
27 May 2008, 5:00 am
As a practical matter, it just ain't so.Second, the clients are, in fact, very unlikely to understand the implications of the retention agreement they'll be offered under the ALI proposal. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm
In every case, however, “[t]he potential harm to the child must be severe, and the level of risk and danger required to trigger this exception has consistently been held to be very high. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
So it is impossible for the "rule" to affect any FDA action - no matter what it could be - taken before that date, since before that the FDAAA, and the "rule," didn't exist. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
Grade — Will: B. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 4:46 am
Rule 606(b), which you can find here, essentially says that (i) jurors can’t testify about “any matter or statement” that occurred during the jury’s deliberations but (ii) can testify as to “whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury’s attention. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:11 am
But I don’t suppose either Phaidon or Baron de Coubertin would have predicted the move which triggered this piece of litigation. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 10:10 am
§ 1071(b)(1). [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm
ROK Entm’t Gp. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:10 pm
Here, defendant has, without a peep, submitted to full discovery in this matter. [read post]
