Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Co. 1956), and in Pennsylvania appellate state court decisions dating back to at least 34 years ago in the case of Wolgemuth v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:20 am
Our brief shows how the canonical equal protection cases United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm
Two years ago, the Court launched a thousand law review articles on this topic with its decision in Stoneridge v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:23 am
Supreme Court made its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:52 am
Judicial Watch filed a FOIA request with the DOD on May 3. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 12:15 am
In People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:08 am
California v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
Cardozo stated: “Congress may spend money in aid of the ‘general welfare’ . . . [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:14 am
However, the International Law Commission opines some legal incidents may attach to an antecedent treaty because it “establishes a legal nexus between the territory and the treaty” such that a successor state will be bound by it. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:04 pm
In Snyder v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:19 pm
” The Court held, however, that reports of arrest or charges can nevertheless be capable of conveying a defamatory meaning “where it is stated, either directly or by clear implication, that an offence has been committed, and the qualifications contained in any of the surrounding statements are not sufficient to outweigh or nullify the effect of what appears to be a plain statement of fact,” citing Shave v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 8:37 pm
That figure could easily exceed 2.5 million if marijuana were legal for medicinal purposes in all 50 states plus D.C., as there are an average of 7.7 patients for every 1,000 population right now. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
On 23 and 24 May 2012 there will be an application in the case of Radford v Frade. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:49 pm
The First Circuit, on the other hand, concluded that because the dissenting Rapanos Justices would find jurisdiction under either Justice Scalia's plurality test or Justice Kennedy's "significant nexus" test, " ‘the United States may elect to prove jurisdiction under either test.' " United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 5:49 am
” State v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:31 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:35 am
State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:31 am
Hearings tomorrow in the House of Representatives on PTAB Appointments Clause Issues arising from the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
Standard Fire at Use in Practice in Arkansas Deaton v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:09 am
* Crass and Offensive Tweets by Student May not Justify Suspension — Rosario v. [read post]
