Search for: "Parks v. State" Results 8541 - 8560 of 10,192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2021, 1:23 am by Joe Mullin
Noncompliant platforms can be fined up to $250,000 per day, unless the platform also happens to own a large theme park in the state. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
  The state also alleged that the unregistered civil rights group had instigated the famous Montgomery bus boycott that followed Rosa Park’s arrest for refusing to give her bus seat to a white passenger. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
” SB 118: UC Enrollment Changes Not A CEQA “Project” Senate Bill 118 was the State Legislature’s targeted response to Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard an application and the first day of the trial in Kim v Park. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Specifically, in the recent case of Worsoff v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 6:21 am by INFORRM
Spotlight on Corruption stated aim was to enable the public better to understand these proceedings by reference to the material that was before the Court at trial. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge dismissed the $250 million defamation lawsuit filed by high school student Nicholas Sandmann against The Washington Post. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
, has expressed concern, stating: “Matters of such public importance and interest should be allowed to be discussed freely and with the highest degree of legal protection.” Next week in the courts On Monday 31 October 2011, the trial of El Naschie v MacMillan Publishers Ltd will begin before Sharp J (without a jury). [read post]