Search for: "People v Justice A." Results 8541 - 8560 of 23,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 9:53 pm by Jeff Gamso
 That despite what we were taught in 4th grade civics, our is The Law of Rule at least as much as it is The Rule of Law.Which brings me to Thursday morning.That's when Chief Justice Roberts wrote for a 6 Justice majority in King v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
  Holding doors open for other people springs to mind. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case is not that remarkable, but the Justices make a few off-hand comments that will interest lawyers who handle Section 1983 cases.The case is District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 11:11 am by John Floyd
    A 2016 report by the Brennan Center for Justice found that 39 percent of the American prison population (roughly 2 million people) could be safely returned to society. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:46 am by Erika Bachiochi
It’s the proper role of the legislature, as recognized in Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Does any of them have a program the purpose of which is to solve the A2J problem that is the unaffordability of legal services for the majority of the population that is middle and lower income people? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The issue here reminds me a bit of one criticism of Justice White’s infamous opinion in Bowers v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 12:13 pm by Eric Goldman
As Joan Biskupic of CNN explained, Justice Kagan added this line to persuade Justice Barrett to switch from Justice Alito’s opinion to hers. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
  [W]e do not want people to feel undignified when they walk into any place of business and do business that, you know, serves the public. . . . [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 6:33 pm
Brady, in Gideon, or striking down Plessy v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
After getting a chance to actually read the majority and dissenting opinions in Cumo v. [read post]