Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 8541 - 8560 of 10,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm by Frank Cranmer
That right might therefore be overridden by a state body, provided there was a sufficiently pressing need to do so for one of the purposes in Article 9(2) and the means used were both lawful and proportionate, applying the four-stage proportionality test in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) (SC(E)) [2014] AC 700 [at 20] and allowing the state body an appropriate discretionary area of judgment. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:50 am by Steven M. Gursten
Although a two-judge majority on the Michigan Court of Appeals reversed, the dissenting judge, Douglas B. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:41 pm by Michael Lowe
The term “controlled substance” means “a drug or other substance, or immediate precursor, included in schedule I, II, III, IV, or V of part B of this subchapter. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am by William McGrath
He further ordered the prosecutors to review those memoranda and promptly turn over to the defense any material under Brady v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 2:42 pm by Rob Robinson
Initiated in the fall of 2018 and refreshed semi-annually, this iteration of the survey was graciously distributed and reviewed by the leadership team* at the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS) and had the highest responder rate of any predictive coding survey to date with 100 data and legal discovery professionals sharing their understanding and experience as part of the four question survey. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 6:23 am
State Citation: 2008 WY 42 Docket Number: S-07-0199 Appeal from the District Court of Natrona County, Honorable David B. [read post]