Search for: "State v. Keis" Results 8541 - 8560 of 22,499
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
“The regulatory history of the HIPAA demonstrates that neither HIPAA nor its implementing regulations were intended to preempt tort actions under state law arising out of the unauthorized release of a plaintiff’s medical records,” Justice Flemming Norcott wrote for a unanimous court in Byrne v. [read post]
“The regulatory history of the HIPAA demonstrates that neither HIPAA nor its implementing regulations were intended to preempt tort actions under state law arising out of the unauthorized release of a plaintiff’s medical records,” Justice Flemming Norcott wrote for a unanimous court in Byrne v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:06 pm by William Ford
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the decision of the Eastern District of Virginia in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 8:46 am by Jacqueline R. McAllister
Shortly thereafter, the Appeals Chamber affirmed almost all of the convictions of six former Croatian officials in Prosecutor v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:35 pm by Ilya Somin
Back in 2012, Supreme Court ruled that the mandate is constitutional in its highly controversial decision in NFIB v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:05 am by Terry Hart
But that meant it had to figure out a way to state it in a manner that courts could apply. [read post]