Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 19,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2021, 1:59 pm
However, in Gordon v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
[If you want some handy tips on how to speed-read all those comments, try the Wired How-To Wiki, here] In case you missed it, Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc UKSC 2012/0220 is not going on appeal to the United Kingdom's Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 7:39 am
Anthem Sports, LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:56 am
Sara Designs, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:47 am
Gang Cao v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:43 am
In essence, the General Court annulled the EUIPO BoA decision that invalidated the EUTM “Damier Azur”, stating that the BoA had erred in its assessment of distinctive character acquired through use of the mark at issue, as it had wrongly limited its analysis to a restricted set of evidence. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:07 am
Royal Crown Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:13 am
Bonehead Brands, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
He stated that "You don't need to fix the patent system - it's not broken. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:26 am
Clemente Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 8:27 pm
On Afro-IP, Caroline NCube's series on African states' IP policy takes her alphabetically from Cameroon to Comoros. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:27 pm
Washington State start-up NautiGirl received a trade mark cancellation notice from global lifestyle apparel house Nautica and its parent, VF Corp. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:48 am
The title is "Effective trade mark and brand protection and enforcement strategies from national to regional and going global: brand owners’ needs v legal obligations and available procedural means". [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:56 pm
Vinluan-Jularbal v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
The IPKat's resident expert in the affairs of the higher echelons of the British judiciary informs him that litigation in the UK in the honest concurrent use dispute of Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnick v Anheuser-Busch Inc (noted by the IPKat here) is not going any further. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 6:33 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:10 am
This case seems to begetting out of hand ...To recap, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling on Wednesday 16 September in the '3D chocolate finger' trade mark case, Case C-215/14 Nestlé v Cadbury [noted by Eleonora here]. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 2:28 pm
In McFadden v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 12:32 am
The case of O’Connor and others v Oakhurst Dairy This odd judgment begins: ‘For want of a comma, we have this case’. [read post]
