Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 29,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2019, 8:28 pm
Price v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Lopez v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 10:26 am
In Dennis Smith v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 3:51 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 1:48 pm
This cannot be over stated. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 9:37 am
The second case Judge O'Connor cites in this footnote, Planned Parenthood of Gulf Coast, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court reiterated this concern in its 1960 decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
As 2018 draws to a close, RPLG has no plans of slowing down. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 11:13 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:52 pm
By James V. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:43 am
On November 28, 2018, oral argument was heard in Tyson Tibbs v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 6:29 am
") Brief Thoughts on Jesner v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 2:00 pm
Moreover, DOJ components should clearly state that noncompliance with these “voluntary standards will not, in itself, result in any enforcement action. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:59 am
See Gotlib v. [read post]
