Search for: "States v. State" Results 8541 - 8560 of 258,425
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
G&G’s argument states that they were granted the exclusive rights to the commercial distribution of the Saul “Canelo” Alvarez v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Whenever I teach the federalism portion of my first-year constitutional law course, at least one cynical (but clever) student observes that the juxtaposition between United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Nyazee, The Probable Islamic State of the Future, (October 21, 2023).Mark Satta, 303 Creative v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
United States X, formerly known as Twitter, has filed a federal defamat [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am by CMS
In this post, Shabbir Bokhari, a paralegal in the Litigation & Arbitration team at CMS comments on the decision from the Supreme Court in R (AAA and Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42 which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:25 am by Rose Hughes
The Guidelines currently require that, when amending or adapting the description in line with the claims, the applicant must either delete subject matter not covered by the claims, or explicitly state in the description that such subject matter is not part of the invention (F-IV, 4.3). [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm by Roos Klomberg
In recent years, it has become apparent that, despite the shared obligation for all Member States to adhere to the same fundamental rights standards, their practices are sometimes not in line with these standards (see for example the Dutch life long prison sentence which was not in line with Article 3 ECHR until recently (Murray v. the Netherlands, app. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
”We believe the Attorney General should lead by example, and afford justice to abuse victims, rather than hide behind technical objections which work to wrongfully prolong a victim’s trauma and which needlessly delay a claim’s disposition.Sadly, hypocrisy tends to be the scarlet letter when it comes to politics.# # #DECISIONFenton v State of New YorkATTORNEY GENERAL'S STATEMENT (upon CVA's enactment) [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Ron DeSantis signed into law.Amid so many missteps and missed opportunities, the worst of all was the Supreme Court’s June 29 decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:34 pm
  It is worth considering if only because it represents, in a general way, much of the thinking that is gaining increasing traction not just among developing states, but also among a certain sector of academic and policy elites in liberal democratic developed states. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:02 pm by Christopher J. Walker
It is also possible that the Court itself could adopt this remedy in Jarkesy, based on its recent decisions in United States v. [read post]