Search for: "US v. Banks" Results 8541 - 8560 of 13,987
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2012, 1:00 am
 Citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Zauderer v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:07 am by Susan Brenner
 or any person entrusted with the control, care or custody of any money or other property who, with intent to steal or to deprive the owner of the property, converts the property to his own or another's use is guilty of larceny.Powell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:41 am by Brandon Kain
  VTB was an English-incorporated company owned by a Russian bank, JSC VTB Bank (“VTB Moscow”). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:49 am
Kookmin Bank [2011] 1 WLR 2900; [2011] UKSC 50 at [21] to [30]. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 6:11 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Recent highlights include: multiple nationalities in EU Private International Law the European Court of Human Rights and Private International Law parallel litigation in Europe and the US arbitration and the powers of English courts conflict of laws in emission trading res judicata effects of arbitral awards The Yearbook includes the following contributions: Doctrine Stefania Bariatti, Multiple Nationalities and EU Private International Law – Many Questions and Some Tentative… [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:06 am by Jack Pringle
”)The intrastate nature of the transaction was not changed by the existence of a national warranty or the fact that the homebuyer used a bank in North Carolina to finance his home purchase. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:06 am by Jack Pringle
”)The intrastate nature of the transaction was not changed by the existence of a national warranty or the fact that the homebuyer used a bank in North Carolina to finance his home purchase. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:44 am by Sheppard Mullin
Rather than following the “manifestly evident” standard set forth less than three weeks earlier by a separate panel of the Federal Circuit in CLS Bank International v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
La. 2012), Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:51 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
Iraq applied to discharge the injunction on the grounds that the money due to the state was immune from execution by virtue of the State Immunity Act 1978, s 13(2)(b), (4) as the funds were not property “for the time being in use or intended for use for commercial purposes”. [read post]