Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2017, 8:10 am
United States, 333 F.3d 1211, 1215 (11th Cir. 2003). [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:29 am
As to the statute of limitations defense, he found that the defendants met their initial burden of showing that the claims accrued within the one-year period of the applicable statute of frauds, i.e., in 2000, thus requiring commencement of suit by 2006. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am
His dissertation examined probabilistic models of burdens and standards of proof. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 12:52 pm
No. 40 and Pasillas v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm
In evaluating the possession challenge, the court noted that possession may be actual or constructive (State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm
In evaluating the possession challenge, the court noted that possession may be actual or constructive (State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:14 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:27 am
The federal court in San Antonio, Texas emphasized that it was not ruling on the validity of the legislative plans under VRA Section 2 or the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
(Class 46) United States US General Can the ITC keep pace? [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:53 am
In 2013, a New York federal district court in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 10:21 am
EFF’s Matthew Guariglia described the merging of both government and corporate surveillance, and federal and local surveillance, that's happening around the country today: “Police make very effective marketers, and a lot of the manufacturers of technology are counting on it….If you are living in the United States today you are likely walking past or carrying around street level surveillance everywhere you go, and this goes double if you live in a… [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
The post highlights the need to be aware of the e-Privacy Regulation and the additional regulatory burden this would impose come 2019. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am
It is unclear how specific the explanation that the platform provides needs to be, but in any event this process seems likely to impose significant administrative burdens on platforms. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:57 am
This is a responsibility few lawyers are willing to accept, in large part because the United States Supreme Court has made pursuing a civil case against a prosecutor or judge practically impossible. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:30 pm
The California supreme court in Donohue v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:06 am
The United States cannot seek or obtain relief that thwarts the enforcement of S.B. 8 in those situations. [read post]
