Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 16,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2019, 2:32 pm
If suitably covered, this does not look like a bed, to which some patients might object and which others might welcome with misplaced enthusiasm. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 7:52 pm
“Honesty” derives from the Old French (h)oneste, which in turn derives from the Latin honestas. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 12:28 pm
What … does ‘control of escalation’ mean? [read post]
Guest Post: Eye witness account of India's first compulsory license appeal before the IPAB [Part II]
8 Mar 2013, 2:47 am
The Board stated that the law does not contemplate the grant of a compulsory license soon after the grant of a patent. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 12:02 pm
., A NEVADA CORPORATION, Appellees.No. 05-17-01011-CVCourt of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas.Opinion Filed November 7, 2017.Julian Ross, for Appellant, Pro se.Andrew H. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 7:05 am
by Neil H. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm
Karst – On August 16, 2010, FDA announced that the Agency plans to follow through on previous correspondence threatening to withdraw approval of all marketing applications for the Subpart H (accelerated approval) drug Midodrine HCl. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
” 410 ILCS 517/15(h). [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
J. 523***George H. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:57 pm
It was these two issues which H sought to appeal to the Lands Tribunal. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am
Strictly, the sufficiency of their interest to object to this petition does not fall for decision because, in their initial letter of objection, they state that they are ‘not raising a formal objection…’ [They] have not elected to become parties opponent; and I propose to take their observations, and representations, into account when reaching my decision irrespective of their formal standing to object to this faculty petition. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
M(H). [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
” 410 ILCS 517/15(h). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:46 am
Yet that case is inapposite, as the court explicitly stated that ” § 207(h) does not apply in this case,” and that ” § 207(h), and the cases interpreting it, are inapplicable. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:36 pm
Internal Revenue Code, an individual may deduct fromincome expenses incurred with respect to attendance at a conference or convention held inPanama in the same manner and to the same extent the individual would be permitted todeduct such expenses with respect to attendance at a conference or convention held in theUnited States, provided that there is in effect between Panama and the United States a taxinformation exchange agreement meeting the requirements of section 274(h)(6). [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:02 pm
On the broader issue whether wages paid to children were deductible, Justice Woods relied upon the Symes decision of the Supreme Court of Canada: [19] In considering the interplay between s. 18(1)(a) and (h), the majority decision in Symes concluded that the prohibition for personal expenditures in s. 18(1)(h) does not apply to an expenditure that was laid out for the purpose of earning income. [read post]
28 May 2007, 2:22 pm
J. 22***Bruce H. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
H. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:00 am
” [See the letter ruling for the Comptroller’s response; also, the agency stated that “If the REIT does not meet the specific criteria listed in the tax code, then it will be considered a taxable entity. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 3:29 pm
Why does this experiment suggest that the Google Book Settlement is needed? [read post]
