Search for: "OR Specific, Inc." Results 8561 - 8580 of 37,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2019, 6:09 am by Andrew Hamm
PDS Consultants Inc. 19-329Issues: (1) Whether the Tucker Act’s grant of bid-protest jurisdiction to the Court of Federal Claims extends to suits that challenge the lawfulness of a federal agency’s acquisition policies and practices, and their underlying statutory foundation, outside the context of a specific solicitation regarding, or the award of, a government contract; and (2) whether Congress intended 38 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 5:32 am by admin
    Booth, to be specific, allegedly directed certain clients to make out checks or wire money to an entity named Insurance Trends Inc., according to the U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 5:32 am by admin
    Booth, to be specific, allegedly directed certain clients to make out checks or wire money to an entity named Insurance Trends Inc., according to the U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 12:43 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
A group of small businesses and their individual owners have filed a putative class action lawsuit in a New York federal district court against online lender Kabbage, Inc. that alleges Kabbage engaged in a “rent-a-charter” scheme to make loans at interest rates that were usurious under state law. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
In re Vitamin Shoppe Procurement Services, Inc., Serial Nos. 86905555, 86905614, 86905620, 86905628 (October 4, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Deputy Chief Judge Mark A. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 1:59 pm by Nathan
The Ninth Circuit noted that authorization is “an affirmative notion” indicating access must be restricted except to those specifically permitted. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 1:24 pm by Bill Campbell
The specific chemical exposure(s) causing lung injuries associated with e-cigarette product use, or vaping, remains unknown at this time. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:11 am by Dale Carpenter
Clayton County (11th Circuit) and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 6:05 am
Essendant also serves as a further reminder that a contractual party’s acceptance of a termination fee, absent specific contractual language to the contrary, will not preclude that party from pursuing a breach of contract claim. [read post]
      The right to be forgotten ends at the borders of the EU In its decision of 10 March 2016 the CNIL had imposed a fine of €100,000 on Google Inc. because of the latter’s refusal, when granting a de-referencing request, to apply it to all its search engine’s worldwide domain name extensions. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by Ranchod Law Group
An attorney should be contacted for advice on specific legal issues. [read post]