Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES" Results 8561 - 8580 of 9,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
At page 51, Justice Scalia, writing for the court, cited a law review article entitled, “The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:57 am by Adam Wagner
This could ultimately cost the UK a lot of money in compensation payments, although it is of note that the court has did not award compensation in Hirst or the more recent case of Frodl v Austria, The coalition government will be wary of the European Court of Human Rights’ recently acquired new powers to punish intransigent states. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:47 am
The 20 December 2005 judgment of Judge John Jones in Kitzmiller v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 3:19 pm by Matthew David Brozik
McCollum, decided October 11, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit found that the trial court—the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:24 pm by Joe Koncelik
Title V permits-  a program originally designed to make air permitting more easily understood, has led to permits that are hundreds of pages long. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:02 am by Robert Horton
  The [United States Geological Service] population models, which predict a trend of extinction across three of the four polar bear ecoregions in as little as 75 years, particularly give the court pause. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:53 am
The panel concluded that Board members are inferior officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause; and thus properly appointed by the SEC. [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:59 pm
The document, beginning on page 9, described the destruction between December 2004 and March 2005 of “a number of the recordings” of questioning sessions with Al-Marri that had occurred in June 2003 and sometime in 2004. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:06 am by John L. Welch
" There was no evidence that Michoacana has any meaning in the United States vis-a-vis ice cream. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
“This case,” the judge wrote, “is yet the latest chapter in the judiciary’s continuing challenge to balance the national security interests of the United States with the individual liberties of our citizens. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm by Orin Kerr
He has written and joined decisions that greatly enraged the “traditional liberal legal elites,” such as Citizens United and and Parents Involved v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Additionally, as the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida noted in Mills, National Security would also be able to raise any affirmative defenses it might have against individual insureds. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am by SHG
 Via Brad Heath, Judge Singal eliminates the “middle man” in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Brian Maude
Case in point: on June 17th, the United States Supreme Court (in the case of City of Ontario v. [read post]