Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 8561 - 8580 of 178,509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2006, 7:03 am
The county court granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment finding that Walling had satisfied the requirements of adverse possession. [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 7:03 am
The county court granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment finding that Walling had satisfied the requirements of adverse possession. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 8:45 am by Steven Cohen
Chung’s report does not show whether he reviewed any of the Plaintiffs prior medical records or if he personally examined the Plaintiff. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 9:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
In particular, the court found that the plaintiffs did not satisfy the extrinsic test, whereby the court determined whether any elements of plaintiffs’ eight-note ostinato (defined as “a continually repeated musical phrase or rhythm”) from the song “Joyful Noise” were protected and objectively similar to the allegedly infringing eight-note ostinato from Perry’s song “Dark Horse. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 10:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs benefit at issue in this due process claim was that Plaintiff was entitled to the DOH’s approval without a Type-I review by Defendants. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 8:06 pm
The latest news in the Gee's Bend lawsuits is that the federal court judge in the third of the three lawsuits is trying to determine the value of the two quilts at issue (which were recently returned to the plaintiff) in order to figure out whether the $75,000 threshold for diversity jurisdiction has been met. [read post]
18 May 2016, 12:10 pm by David Kravets
Rather, plaintiff is alleging that as a result of its pages being removed from Google’s search results, Google falsely stated that e-ventures’ websites failed to comply with Google’s policies. [read post]
Partners Joseph Garrison, Stephen Fitzgerald, Nina Pirrotti, and Joshua Goodbaum have been selected to the Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Employment Lawyers Guide for 2019. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOE's Deputy Chancellor for Teaching and Learning denied Plaintiff's appeal and sustained the Supervising Principal's rating of unsatisfactory. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
Subsequently, Plaintiff noted that Plaintiff's first name was spelled incorrectly. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 2:00 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
   The court stated that, even after the Defendant became aware of the Plaintiffs alleged lost wages, there still remained conflicting evidence about the extent of the Plaintiffs injuries in light of the IME completed and the evidence of the Plaintiffs subsequent accidents. [read post]
” In November of 2011, the plaintiff sent a letter to the defendant, stating that the defendant was not to market the plaintiffs 2011 grain without the plaintiffs permission. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by André Mouledoux
District Judge Nannette Olivette Brown rejected plaintiffs argument that he should be allowed to maintain the prospective claim until the point he reaches maximum cure. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
Even in the strongest case for disclosure of an author’s identity — when the plaintiff wants to sue the author and the identity is absolutely necessary for the lawsuit to succeed — New York’s news gatherer’s privilege appears to bar the subpoena. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Where plaintiff was an employee of the company that leased a building, and she brought a negligence and negligence per se claim against the owner of the building after she fell off a staircase that allegedly was not up to code, summary judgment for the building owner was affirmed; plaintiff, plaintiffs employer, and defendant landlord had co-extensive knowledge of the allegedly dangerous condition. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:38 pm by Jeff DeFrancisco
While comparative negligence is a valid defense and can diminish or preclude a plaintiffs recovery of compensation, mere allegations that a plaintiffs carelessness causes a crash is insufficient to establish fault. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 9:27 am
Reversing a trial court’s grant of summary judgment for the plaintiff policyholder, the Oregon Court of Appeals found that a plaintiff’s injuries from being struck by a bicyclist as she crossed the street did not trigger PIP coverage under her auto insurance policy. [read post]