Search for: "Robert Thomas"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 10,845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 8:21 am
Justices Thomas and Scalia dissented. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
Robert Barnes writes, "Supreme Court restricts life without parole for juveniles," for the Washington Post. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Robert Barnes at the Washington Post highlights Justice Thomas’s “stinging” dissent, while Lyle Denniston’s coverage for SCOTUSblog focuses on the decision’s practical implications for juveniles currently sentenced to life without parole. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:40 am
Roberts Jr. voted with the majority in saying that the inmate who brought the appeal had received a sentence so harsh that it violated the Constitution. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
ROBERTS, C. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:00 pm
Kudos to Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Scalia (neither of whom I have wanted on the Court, nonetheless) by dissenting and insisting on more brakes on Congressional authority under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm
Florida - 8th Amendment prohibits LWOP for any kid who doesn't kill (5-4, opinion by Kennedy); 8th Amendment prohibits LWOP for Graham, but maybe not for all kids who don't kill (Roberts concurring); don't be silly (Thomas, joined by Scalia and for the most part by Alito) (Alito briefly and alone explaining that Roberts is as off the tracks as Kennedy & Co, though he doesn't put it that way).US v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:45 pm
In short, Justice Thomas clearly loves the states, but apparently not enough to promote either thei [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:37 pm
Chief Justice Roberts, in the majority, was in strong opposition against his fellow conservatives Alito, Thomas and Scalia, who dissented. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:03 pm
Maybe Merrick Garland would be, or so I’ve heard some say; but I doubt this would be so as to Diane Wood or Sidney Thomas. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:00 pm
I also agree with most of the strong critique of the majority opinion in Justice Thomas’ dissent (joined by Justice Scalia). [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:56 am
While Justice Thomas would apparently not rule out a death sentence for a $50 theft by a 7-year-old, see post, at 4, 10, n. 3, the Court wisely rejects his static approach to the law. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:37 am
And this language was joined by Chief Justice Roberts, and not just the four liberals. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:14 am
Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Scalia, did not. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:49 am
Justice Kennedy filed a concurring opinion that Justice Thomas joined. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:25 am
Roberts, Jr. concurred in the judgment. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:14 am
Only Scalia and Thomas dissented; the dissent offers quite a narrow vision of federal power (one that even Alito and Roberts could not accept). [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:58 am
Chief Justice Roberts concurred. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:51 am
Perhaps most intriguing about the case was Justice Thomas's implication - flagged and flogged by Justice Stevens in concurrence - that the Consitution would allow executions of young children. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:25 am
Thomas was joined in part on his dissent by Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
