Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
On March 4, 2009, in its 6-3 decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:26 am
The Flores court correctly noted that, “since Fisher, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Concepcion has altered the legal landscape substantially. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In a 1950 California case, State Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
Orin Kerr states in part two of his comprehensive analysis of Swartz's case that Aaron's Law would not have changed the outcome. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
Orin Kerr states in part two of his comprehensive analysis of Swartz's case that Aaron's Law would not have changed the outcome. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit issued its ruling in Young v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:52 am
California. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, is significant because: (1) it involves a dispute over some fundamental but complex First Amendment doctrinal principles; (2) it conflicts with a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and (3) (for reasons 1 and 2), it may very well end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am
Venard had signed as a condition of his membership with the United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association (USHPA). [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:04 pm
See United Steelworkers v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm
United States, in which the Court was persuaded that a taking could exist for temporary flooding situations, arguably expanding the scope of another leading regulatory takings decision, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:14 pm
Late on Tuesday, Apple and Samsung filed a joint stipulation with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California concerning the addition of new products, or new product versions, to the second case pending between these parties in that district. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment states that “[t]he validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
United States and Pleau v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:37 pm
Lori Drew and in United States v. [read post]
