Search for: "State v. Register" Results 8561 - 8580 of 13,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
The problem, stated at its most general, is simple. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:22 pm
The University of Iowa and The Board of Regents, State of Iowa v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:26 am by Dennis Crouch
” In its petition for certiorari, DG argued that the Fourth Circuit’s decision conflicts with United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  And this is true for registered/unregistered both, I think.Should registered marks be different? [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 8:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm by Cody M. Poplin
Susan flagged the Department of Justice’s motion to vacate the preliminary injunction in Klayman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Margaret Sachs
    The Supreme Court yesterday issued its decision in Morrison v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Nevertheless, containing a little over 71,000 words spread over 578 paragraphs and 161 pages - registering as a full 8.4 on the Arnold Scale - this is no lightweight. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:52 am by Stefanie Levine
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog.com and Practice Center Contributor) The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 7:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
For example, what about the third parties who have registered domain names? [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:22 am by Mack Sperling
A motion on similar facts was denied last week in the case of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:03 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Even registering a trademarked term as a domain name, and using it to put up a site criticizing the mark owner, has been held to be protected First Amendment activity in a number of cases (see, e.g., Lucas Nursery & Landscaping, Inc. v. [read post]