Search for: "State v. So " Results 8561 - 8580 of 116,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2007, 6:47 am
  The reports have been known about for some time, and are mentioned prominently in the complaint in McIntosh v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 3:09 pm by anbrandon
It determined that if the state appellate court had addressed this claim at all, it had done so using the wrong standard or a less protective state standard. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 2:46 pm
Because I wanted to see cases from the 4/1 (San Diego), and yet this opinion clearly states right on the caption that it's from Orange County. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
Alternatively, the Court may be implying that once the state relies on the constitutional permission to take affirmative action for some backward classes, it must do so for all of them. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In Sistersong Women of Reproductive Justice Collective v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm by Dan Ernst
Textually, I argue, the Indian Commerce Clause and Indians Not Taxed Clause serve as express authorization for Congress to create legal classifications based on Indian race and ancestry, so long as those classifications are not arbitrary, as the Supreme Court stated a century ago in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm
  We're getting less fuel per gallon than people in other states. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 11:38 am by Jim Slaughter
Interestingly, the case of North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:22 am by Patrick McGinnis
It is very common in first-party litigation for the policyholder to sue the in-state adjuster in addition to the out-of-state insurance company and thereby destroy diversity so the case remains in state court. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
Reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in United States Forest Service v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm by Jon Katz
Supreme Court made this more so by reversing the Kansas Supreme Court's invalidation of a police traffic stop that relied on nothing more than that the owner of the vehicle had a revoked license, without having any pre-stop idea whether the owner was the driver.Kansas v. [read post]