Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 8561 - 8580 of 14,274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2018, 12:03 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Strong, ubiquitous commercial encryption has created a range of legal problems for which the appropriate metaphors remain unfixed. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:50 am
State, the defendant’s neighbors called the police after noting a strong stench coming from his property and observing his dogs barking and carrying their empty food dishes. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:05 pm by Richard Flores
In a follow up to last year’s blog entry regarding the case Association of Molecular Pathology, et al. v United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al we continue to look into this potentially revolutionary biotechnology case. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 2:01 pm
Last year, he was part of the Skadden team that successfully argued Merrill Lynch v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 11:17 am by News Desk
The manager of Baja Fresh called police after noticing a “strong chemical odor” similar to bleach at the salsa self-serve bar. [read post]
15 May 2008, 2:24 pm
The furor: Justice Corrigan joined the majority opinion in National Pride at Work v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 4:10 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Strong, ubiquitous commercial encryption has created a range of legal problems for which the appropriate metaphors remain unfixed. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
 On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 9:58 pm
In response to the defendant's pre-sentence memorandum requesting leniency in sentencing, the District Attorney's Office, citing United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:36 am by John J. Sullivan
  It’s kind of appropriate, though, because the court’s opinion n Lateef v. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 11:13 am by Ronald Mann
” Moreover, the complaint also must “state with particularity facts” that “giv[e] rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with the required state of mind. [read post]