Search for: "5 Cal.4th 1"
Results 841 - 860
of 997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
Elder, 63 Cal.App.3d 731, 134 Cal. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
If certification is denied, these cases wither on the vine.[5] C. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:24 am
See NAYPPA.3-56WIdaho -5.4v.Arizona -1.1+ 28our line +41actual +70+41 pts :: 7-48A 1-point difference in SPRS ratings equals 9 points on the scoreboard so that Idaho rated -5.4 and Arizona -1.1 or a difference of 4.3, multiplied by 9 = 38.7. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 4th 1188, 1200 (Cal. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:55 am
., 153 Cal. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
Cal. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
County of Alameda (1995) 9 Cal. 4th 1055, 892 P.2d 150, 40 Cal. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
Cal. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:11 pm
Drever, 16 Cal.4th 1167, 69 Cal.Rptr.2d 764, 947 P.2d 1301, 1302, 1307-08 (Cal. 1997). [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:34 pm
On May 1, 2013, the insured received an email purportedly from Salicylates stating that Salicylates had changed bank accounts and directed that all payments be made to the new bank account at Natwest Bank. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
City of Los Angeles, 47 Cal.4th 970 (2010), which held that a trial court has discretion in a FEHA case to deny a successful plaintiff his attorneys' fees when the plaintiff chooses to proceed in an unlimited civil jurisdiction, but recovers less than the jurisdictional minimum. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Nov. 5, 2014). [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
One such example is the third edition’s treatment of confidence intervals.[1] The “DNA Identification” chapter noted that the meaning of a confidence interval is subtle,[2] but I doubt that the authors, David Kaye and George Sensabaugh, actually found it subtle or difficult. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
., 85 Cal. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
”[5] Judge Weinstein was no push-over for strident defense counsel or expert witnesses, but the legal consequences were nonetheless obvious to him, when he looked carefully at the animal studies plaintiffs’ expert witnesses were claiming to support their opinions. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
NVR, Inc., 307 Fed Appx. 730 (4th Cir. 2009), and Ellis v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1 (1890); Alden v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 6:35 pm
App. 4th 1295 (2010). [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm
(2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094, the California Supreme Court held the additional compensation to be awarded to employees under Labor Code section 226.7 when an employer fails to provide required meal periods and/or rest periods is more akin to a wage than a penalty and was therefore subject to a three-year statute of limitations and not the one-year statute of limitations applicable to statutory penalties. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:01 pm
Ebertowski, 228 Cal. [read post]
