Search for: "A. T."
Results 841 - 860
of 881,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2018, 9:48 am
A Saturday Night crash in Orlando on the 3rd of March left one person dead and several others in the hospital after a T-bone crash at the intersection of Wetherbee Road and Bohannon Boulevard. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
Competitive Effects of T-Mobile/Sprint: Analysis of a '4-to-3' Merger Thomas W. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:15 am
So no, such problems aren't limited just to AT&T. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:51 am
” So, AT&T and Verizon are out of the auction, as well as any other party that can’t raise $3.59+ billion for 800 MHz spectrum. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:07 am
T. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
William T. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the iterative mathematical algorithm of claim 1 remains a mere mathematical contribution which does not enter into the examination for an inventive step.[6.1] The appellant argues that the choice of algorithm is based on technical considerations as it takes account of technical (e.g. memory) limitations of computers and diverges from a human approach.[6.2] In decision T 1227/05 [3.2.5] it was held that (the sole) processing speed was not a suitable criterion for distinguishing… [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
T 1011/07 [1.4]).[1.2] The applicant provided the following arguments in favour of compliance of the amendment with the requirement of A 123(2).[1.2.1] According to the applicant the original drawing is a real and exact drawing of the flow meter, not a schematic drawing. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Remember T 106/84? [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The [opponents] concluded that in view of decision T 593/09 the grounds pursuant to A 100(b) make it impossible to maintain the patent.[2.2] The catchword of decision T 593/09 (which has been distributed by [opponent 1] during the oral proceedings before the Board) stipulates that where a claim contains an ill-defined parameter and where, as a consequence, the skilled person would not know whether he was working within or outside of the scope of the claim, this, by itself, is not a… [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The criteria to be applied are criteria such as the time of the amendment, its reason, its extent or the difficulty or the complexity of the examination of the amendments as well as the question of allowability of the amended claims (T 942/05 [1.2]; T 81/03 [2.4]) and the general requirements concerning the parties’ conduct of the proceedings that are intrinsic to appeal proceedings. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Other possible irregularities do not preclude rectification of the decision, since an applicant should have the right of examination in two instances (for example T 139/87, T 47/90, T 794/95).[4] Claim 1 of the request which formed the basis for the impugned decision has been amended such that present claim 1 is now directed to a system for humidifying gas for infusion into a patient eye comprising a gas source, as defined in former claim 5. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
In this respect, the present situation is different from that considered in the decisions T 245/87, T 329/94 and T 238/06, referred to by the appellant.Enteral feeding is used to provide nutrition to patients who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth or are unable to swallow safely. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Consequently, if the expression “linked together” would have been regarded by the Board as being ambiguous, as suggested by the appellant, claim 1 would in any case have had to be amended for clarification in order to fulfil the requirements of A 84.This alleged objection of ambiguity has not been raised, neither in the impugned decision, nor by the Board, which has instead chosen to interpret the expression in its broadest normal meaning, as would the skilled person do.[1.4] All the… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:42 pm
According to bankruptcy court documents, T-Boz owns a home in Duluth, Georgia, valued at $1.2 million. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
In this respect, both parties have pointed to a number of decisions by the Boards of Appeal that relate to such intentions to pay fees in connection with the debit order system. [9] In agreement with the [patent proprietor], and in conformity with the jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal, it is necessary for a debit order to be unambiguously recognisable and show a clear and unambiguous intention to make a particular payment, cases T 170/83, T 152/82 and T 152/85. [10]… [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:40 am
As pointed out in a more recent decision T 195/09 (unpublished), "In this respect decision T 108/91 has been clearly overruled by G 1/93" (see Reasons, point 2.1.5).In claim 5 of the patent as granted, the artifact detection is based on the variation in the average deviation Daverage. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus T 836/01 is irrelevant for the present case, too.[35] The Board is of the opinion that the present case rather compares to the situation dealt with in decision T 254/93, which was later followed by the Boards in decisions T 669/01 and T 486/01. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
And the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-185/05 Italy v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:11 am
I realized before I stepped foot on the field that this wasn’t the same T-ball that I played as a kid. [read post]
