Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Private copying levy systems are not harmonised in the EU, and some Member States do not even collect levies or decided to get rid of them altogether. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 9:13 am
This is their same role whether they are appointed as attorneys for the children in a child custody case, which are commonly referred to as “V” docket cases, or in an “N” docket cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
Friends of the Kings River v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:52 pm
(Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc v Shiu, December 12, 2014, Tatel, D; to be reported at 98 EPD ¶45,216) New requirements. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
.* The chorus swells - another entreaty to the AC about BattistelliMerpel recounts of another letter upon the hot issue of the suspension of a Board of Appeal, this time from Dr Tilman Müller-Stoy. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 5:33 am
") AC36791 - State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 5:59 pm
The court also found that, in promulgating the rule, the OFCCP was justified in not exempting construction contractors (Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:43 pm
Executive Office of the President (which forced preservation of digital media in government); United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The Supreme Court was careful to note that it is not possible to state a general rule as to whether or not an Order made by Her Majesty in Council is amenable to judicial review in the courts of England and Wales, given the wide variety of circumstances in which such Orders are made. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am
Lord Sumption also rejected the approaches taken at first instance and by the Court of Appeal in holding that the defence of illegality was a rule of law and that previous attempts to introduce a discretionary element into the doctrine had been expressly rejected by the House of Lords in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
The ACS was the FBI’s Automated Case Support System; as this press release explains, in 2013 the FBI replaced the “paper-based” ACS System with a new digital system. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:54 am
" United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am
In such cases the court is not discussing the truth or reasonableness of any of the doctrines of the religious association, but as stated by Lord Davey in General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland v Overtoun [1904] AC 515 (1904 7 F (HL) 1): “The more humble, but not useless, function of the civil Court is to determine whether the trusts imposed upon property by the founders of the trust are being duly observed. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am
In Sims v Dacorum Borough Council the Court unanimously dismissed the appeal challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision to follow Hammersmith and Fulham LBC V Monk [1992] AC 478. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 3:31 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal brought by the appellant challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision to follow Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk [1992] AC 478, which states that a notice to quit given by one of a number of joint periodic tenants is effective to terminate the tenancy. [read post]
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
The House of Lords decision in R v Salford HA Ex p Janaway Lady Smith found support for her interpretation in the case of R v Salford HA Ex p Janaway [1989] 1 AC 537. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
The exercise of the discretion to set the qualification criteria could in principle be challenged on Padfield grounds (Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997) but no such case is or could be advanced here. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Latimer v. [read post]
