Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 841 - 860 of 9,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Courtcautioned that a statutory damages award could violate due process if “the penalty prescribed is so severe and oppressive as to be wholly disproportioned to the offense and obviously unreasonable. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 3:56 am by Immigration Prof
Supreme Court struck down most of Arizona's S.B. 1070, a tough -- and controversial -- state immigration law. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:00 pm by James Romoser
Just this week, the Supreme Court ordered lower courts to take a fresh look at five convictions in light of the decision. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:43 am by jonathanturley
The Supreme Court has repeatedly stressed that such demands for associational contacts are to be subject to “exacting scrutiny. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 5:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The majority's view to the contrary is in conflict with the Supreme Court's recent landmark ruling, Americans for Prosperity Foundation, 141 S. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
At the outset, as the Supreme Court has made clear, individuals have the right to carry handguns publicly for self-defense. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But one wonders what is the point of a book seeking to defend a liberal or progressive moral reading of the Constitution through the doctrine of substantive due process in light of the Supreme Court’s mix of six conservative and originalist judges. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 12:00 am
Supreme Court in 1990 ruled in a 6-3 decision that sobriety checkpoints are legal because officers are randomly stopping vehicles. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 12:37 pm by Brian Hauss
If the right to boycott is to be preserved, the Supreme Court must step in. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 1:39 pm by Lucy Ricca, Graham Ambrose
In this case, our “client” was the Regulation and Practice Reform Committee of the Michigan Justice for All Commission, co-chaired by Michigan Supreme Court Justice Brian Zahra and former Michigan Bar President Janet Welch. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
As many Verdict readers know, the Supreme Court this term will hear arguments in Moore v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
As the Supreme Court said more than fifty years ago, in the penalty phase of capital cases those who impose the sentence must consider “any aspect of a defendant’s character or record…proffered as a reason for a sentence other than death. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 3:50 am by Lucy Ricca and Graham Ambrose
  In this case, our “client” was the Regulation and Practice Reform Committee of the Michigan Justice for All Commission, co-chaired by Michigan Supreme Court Justice Brian Zahra and former Michigan Bar President Janet Welch. [read post]