Search for: "B. Sullivan" Results 841 - 860 of 1,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Vázquez (Georgetown), Ingrid B. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am by Holly Brezee
§ 1441(b)(2), which is currently under consideration in the matter referenced here. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm by Holly Brezee
§ 1441(b)(2), which is currently under consideration in the matter referenced here. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Sections 3(b)-(e) exempt some opinions and some honest mistakes, but not by any means all. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:40 pm
Although Rule 65(B) provides that: "Within thirty (30) days of the entry of the decision, a party may move the Court to publish any not-for-publication memorandum decision which meets the criteria for publication," I'm told that such motions are not automatically granted. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:33 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Schlichter Bogard fired again in 2016—this time filing a flurry of lawsuits against large private universities in connection with their management of university-sponsored 403(b) plans. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  [I should note I think the Office is completely right in saying (1) §43(a)(1)(B) claims should survive Dastarwhere false attributions are material to consumers and (2) Dastar applies to in-copyright works as well. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:56 am by Wells Bennett
Whether hostilities existed between Al Qaeda and the United States on the dates of the accused’s alleged acts is a question of fact and an element of proof, which must be carried by the government. b. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:08 pm
(b) I will move your information into the main body of the thread. [read post]
27 May 2022, 6:31 am
Payne, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Sunday, May 22, 2022 Tags: Disclosure, ESG, International governance, Russia, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Ukraine Recent Delaware Corporate Law Trends and Developments Posted by Edward B. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Sullivan that he criticized last year. [read post]