Search for: "Banning Company v. California"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
The new law was welcomed by publishers but condemned by internet companies. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Hurlbert operates a small California company, Sage Information Services, that obtains public records from real-property assessment officials on behalf of his clients. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
In Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm
The ban covers visual surveillance equipment “produced by companies subject to the National Intelligence Law of the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 10:53 am
Although EPA initially chose to exclude these uses from its analysis, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered EPA to include them following a successful legal challenge lodged by consumer groups in Safer Chemicals Healthy Families, et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
Don’t assume that Brussels and California effect that occurs w/privacy also occurs when corps can adjust tech granularly. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 9:29 am
Varela, the justices will review a dispute that arose when Frank Varela, a Lamps Plus employee, tried to file a class action in California, alleging that a data breach at the company had broken various state laws. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
The 2021 Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
See Witkoff v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:42 pm
” The import of that second definition is currently before the Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
In California, the public accommodations law led to the end of a ladies’ discount at a car wash in Koire v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
See Timbs v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:00 am
Supreme Court, in Kelo v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
A federal judge ruled that a California law that would have banned carrying firearms in most public places violates the Second Amendment. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit: As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
USA today has noted how social media companies may reach critical mass and become “too big to succeed”. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
* Bland v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:21 pm
The enforcement of the ITC import ban against Samsung (over the "Steve Jobs patent" and a hardware patent) had no impact. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 11:31 am
From Republican National Comm. v. [read post]
