Search for: "Blake v. State" Results 841 - 860 of 930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2013, 7:58 am by Andres
Similarly, asome fabric designs can be given copyright protection as works of art and as prints (see Peter Pan Fabrics v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Scott Harshbarger and Dennis Aftergut
Mayes’ predecessor, Republican Mark Brnovich, was the lead petitioner in Brnovich v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Chris's discussion begins with a summary of New York law concerning marketability discount that I prepared for a post several months ago featuring the Cole v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 26 May 2022, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Aaron Blake lists the pros and cons of six shortlisters. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:28 am by Russ Bensing
Another way was suggested by the 8th District last week in State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:47 am
Box 4210 Helena, MT 59604 Phone: (406) 444-7781; (800) 332-2272 (Toll Free) Fax: (406) 444-7781 Web: http://www.dphhs.state.mt.us/sltc AARP Montana 30 West 14th Street, Suite 301 Helena, MT 59601 Phone: (406) 441-2277 Fax: (406) 441-2230 E-mail: mtaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgstates/mt ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Rocky Mountain Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center 3630 Sinton Road, Suite 103 Colorado Springs, CO 80907 Phone: (719) 444-0268… [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Para 159, to the extent it notes that restitution is “frequently based upon the theory of unjust enrichment”, is undoubtedly correct, but it may not be accurate to suggest that there “can be no restitution without unjust enrichment”, for the law does recognise restitution for wrongs (Attorney General v Blake). [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
In London Historic Parks And Gardens Trust v Minister of State for Housing & Anor [2022] EWHC 829 (Admin), Thornton J held that the grant of planning permission had been ultra vires the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900 and refused permission to appeal. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
All three Claimants in Blake, Seymour and Thorp v Fox [2021] EWHC 3463 (QB) were granted relief from sanctions for failure to serve a Reply and Defence to the counterclaim, and no order was made on the Defendant’s application for Default Judgement. [read post]