Search for: "Bowes v. Bowes" Results 841 - 860 of 1,099
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2010, 9:40 am
You’re Not Alone - http://tinyurl.com/2327c72 (Radhika Marya) Google Signs Data Agreement with UK Regulators - http://tinyurl.com/2fh2v2u (Lora Bentley) Long Live the Web: A Call for Continued Open Standards and Neutrality - http://tinyurl.com/389rc2x (Tim Berners-Lee) Microsoft Supporting Cloud Open Source Code For Hyper-V - http://tinyurl.com/323fudy (Charles Babcock) NIST Provides Guidelines for Securely Deploying IPv6 - http://tinyurl.com/28tcvkn (John Storts) Standards Anyone? [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:57 pm
That, in the judgment of this Council, it is perfectly consistent with the good faith which she owes to the Bishops and Dioceses with which she has been in union since 1862, for any Diocese to decide for herself whether she shall any longer continue in union with this Council;. . .V. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:03 am by Maggie Sicklinger
  The court of appeals used the four part test set out in Seabrook Foods v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:56 am by charonqc
He defended the last two cases brought for blasphemy in the UK against Salman Rushdie (R (ex parte Choudhury) v Bow Street Magistrates Court [1991] 1 QB 429) and Gay News (R v Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617). [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,058,586 owned by Pitney Bowes Inc. and entitled INFORMATION DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING SENDERS WITH A RECIPIENT’S MESSAGING PREFERENCES. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:40 am by Kelly
KG v Apotex Pty Ltd (No 2) (Patentology) MoviPrep – US: Salix and Norgine settle with Novel in patent dispute over MoviPrep (Patent Docs) Nexavar (Sorafenib) – India: Nexavar patent infringement suit before Delhi HC goes directly to trial: Bayer v Cipla (Spicy IP) Simcor (Niacin/Simvastatin) – US: Abbott files patent infringement suit against Teva following Para IV challenge (Patent Docs) Vancocin (Vancomycin) – US: ViroPharma sues FDA over generic Vancocin;… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:48 pm
Cir. 2002), quoting Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am by Woodrow Pollack
The challenged bow ties contain an "Adjustolox" mechanism and are marked with U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:01 am by Elie Mystal
Clearly, this immigration debate is destined for the Supreme Court.Lozano v. [read post]