Search for: "Bury v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2014, 6:10 am
Written by: Andrew Royce The recent Massachusetts Land Court decision in Ry-Co International, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:48 am
Her remains were buried there, against the wishes of her family. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:02 am
For example, following the district court’s decision in United Artists Television v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:01 am
See, for example, Treasury Regulation section 1.61-14(a), Cesarini v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:56 am
Stout v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:33 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court decided Jeffrey Cookson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:10 pm
That's good old fashion Carnival Cruise Line v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:58 am
Touby v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:45 pm
Although the precise start date remains the subject of litigation—see United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
The latest case to address this issue is Dukin v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:45 am
Adam Liptak today covers an effort to persuade the Solicitor General to try to persuade the Supreme Court to use the pending cert petition in Hedges v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:02 pm
In Cruzan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
McClain, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 1:30 am
In the first trial, on December 10, 2010, in Tookes v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm
Both are Article 14 discrimination based, with disabilities meaning a bedroom could not be shared, one adult partners and the other a non-dependant requiring overnight care 2 mights a week.There is also an Upper Tribunal decision, LA v Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (HB) [2013] UKUT 546 (AAC). [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm
Both are Article 14 discrimination based, with disabilities meaning a bedroom could not be shared, one adult partners and the other a non-dependant requiring overnight care 2 mights a week.There is also an Upper Tribunal decision, LA v Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (HB) [2013] UKUT 546 (AAC). [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in 2011 in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 4:31 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
