Search for: "CRIM"
Results 841 - 860
of 4,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2008, 1:49 am
R v R (Video Recording: Admissibility) [2008] EWCA Crim 678; [2008] WLR (D) 95 “A video recording of an interview given had been was properly admitted as evidence in chief at a criminal trial pursuant to a special measures direction made under s27 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, notwithstanding that no notification had been given by the Secretary of State under s18(2) of the Act that such measures were available. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:34 am
Tirnaveanu [2007] EWCA Crim 1239 “Evidence of misconduct by a defendant was evidence "to do with" the alleged facts of the offence with which the defendant was charged and therefore excluded from the definition of bad character in s 98(a) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, if it had some nexus in time with that offence. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:33 am
Campbell [2007] EWCA Crim 1472 “If a defendant's previous convictions were admitted in evidence, the jury could attach significance to them in any respect in which they were relevant and relevance could normally be deduced by the application of common sense. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:30 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) K, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1900 (14 August 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v TB (Jamaica) [2008] EWCA Civ 977 (14 August 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Rideh v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 2019 (Admin) (15 August 2008) Beckett v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 2002 (Admin) (15 August 2008) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) CJP Builders… [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:58 am
R v Hancox and another [2010] EWCA Crim 102; [2010] WLR (D) 30 “The interference that the imposition of a serious crime prevention order would make to a defendant’s freedom of action had to be justified by the public benefit in preventing, restricting or disrupting involvement by the defendant in serious crime; it was not enough that the order might have some benefit. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:24 pm
Crim. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:21 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Williams, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 2126 (02 September 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) H-K (Children) [2011] EWCA Civ 1100 (10 October 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Zajaczkowski v Sad Rejonowy W Malborku Poland [2011] EWHC 2433 (Admin) (02 September 2011) Nursing and Midwifery Council v Murray [2011] EWHC 2434 (Admin) (02 September 2011) High Court (Commercial Court) Stratford Coin & Bullion Inc v Henien & Ors [2011] EWHC 2552… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:14 am
Regina v NW [2010] EWCA Crim 404; [2010] WLR (D) 62 “The words ‘present together’ in the expression ‘Where three or more persons who are present together’ in s 2(1) of the Public Order Act 1986 denoted no more than that the persons concerned were in the same place at the same time. [read post]
26 May 2021, 10:28 am
., CCAL joins Timothy Cline, CRIMS and Tony Menke, CPCU of Cline Insurance to discuss tendering insurance claims for your association, including when you should tender losses to the carrier for various lines of coverage. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:19 am
R v W Stevenson & Sons (A Partnership) [2008] EWCA Crim 273; WLR (D) 60 “Legislation could render a partnership criminally liable as a separate entity from its individual partners. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:33 am
Crim. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 2:59 am
R v Foster; R v Newman; R v Kempster; R v Birmingham [2007] EWCA Crim 2869 “Where the defendant admitted a lesser or different crime from that charged in the indictment it did not necessarily follow that the trial judge was obliged to leave the alternative verdict for a jury's consideration; sometimes it would be appropriate, but sometimes it would not. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 12:22 pm
Crim. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:35 pm
Crim. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 4:00 pm
Crim. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
Crim. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:08 am
R v K [2008] EWCA Crim 185; [2008] WLR (D) 47 “The offence of possessing a document containing information ‘of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism’ was only committed if the document concerned was of a kind that was likely to provide practical assistance to such a person, rather than simply encouraging the commission of terrorist acts. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:57 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Huntley & Anor v Armes [2010] EWCA Civ 396 (11 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Crown Prosecution Service v Neish [2010] EWCA Crim 1011 (06 May 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) (10 May 2010) High Court (Family Division) PM v KH & Anor [2010] EWHC 870 (Fam) (30 April 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
14 May 2007, 6:49 am
Rumor has it that a few others will be joining us too, including Rob Kar (from Loyola LA; jurisprudence), Adam Gershowitz (South Texas; crim), and William Birdthistle (Chi-Kent; corp). [read post]
