Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
January 30, 2019 – transferred from Southern District of California) (purported class action brought against HKA Enterprises under the Fair Credit Reporting Act alleging HKA failed to obtain proper consent or authorization from prospective employees related to employment-related background checks) Carbonaro, et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:37 pm
Under current Idaho law, when a juvenile reaches 18 years of age, he can apply to have his record expunged. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:33 pm
Read the letter from EFF and Media Alliance to the California Department of Justice. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:00 pm
Numerous states — including Iowa, California, Indiana, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Illinois, and Minnesota — have passed state laws preempting harmful nuisance ordinances. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
Employers receiving No-Match Letters in 2019 must take proper steps in addressing the request. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Under current law, companies can expense, or deduct immediately, short-life assets against their taxable income. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:57 pm
The post Five misunderstandings about disciplining employees appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
It acknowledged that it can, and often does, exactly what was being asked of it in the case, After it lost its appeal in the Supreme Court, Google subsequently applied to a California court for a declaratory order that the Canadian de-indexing order was not enforceable against it in California. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 10:25 pm
—after Hawaii, California, and Washington, D.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 11:28 am
Erika Pickles, Employment Law Counsel/HR Adviser Managing leaves of absence isn’t easy. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:01 am
Conceptually, this is reminiscent of the law as to at-will termination of employment, that an employer can fire someone for any reason or no reason, except for an unlawful reason. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
Application to California Employers For California employers, the new DOL Opinion Letter clarifies employer responsibilities – especially after the Ninth Circuit case, Escriba v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Schickman is of counsel with Freeland Cooper & Foreman LLP in San Francisco and Editor of California Employment Law Letter. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Barbara Boxer wrote a letter to then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch inquiring as to how the Department of Justice was collecting data on the subject. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am
A former Apple and Infosys employee who brought a qui tam action against both companies for bringing Indian nationals to the U.S. to train Apple employees, could not plausibly allege that the employer incorrectly brought the Indians to the U.S. under a B-1 rather than an H1-B visa, ruled a federal district court in California. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
Phil Scott The Least Transparent Employer Award - U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Patterson sued, saying he was fired because of his religion in violation of Title VII; Walgreens said it had reasonably accommodated Patterson’s religious observance and that doing any more would impose an “undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business,” and that its conduct therefore was lawful under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:22 am
Referencing the Board’s 1995 decision in California Saw & Knife, as well as the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:24 am
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
