Search for: "California v. Nevada"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2012, 3:21 pm
The Ninth Circuit's decision only applies to states located within the jurisdiction of that Court (Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm
The case, Sevcik v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:30 am
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, in the Office of the Solicitor; v Aja Conrad, Karuk Tribe of California, interning in the office of U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:07 am
California Department of Corrections, 2012 U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm
(Thanks for Eric Goldman) Introductory grafs: Roland Vincent, a law school graduate with a long-inactive license to practice in Nevada (and no admission to the California Bar), agreed to assist acquaintances in California with their California legal problems, and took money from them for that purpose. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:17 pm
Such waivers were included in the guaranty in Gramercy Investment Trust v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:53 am
In Sierra Pacific Power Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:30 am
The article notes that a recent federal decision, IDT Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
Bell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
WHD will seek to enforce this position in the states making up the Ninth Circuit -- Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington -- notwithstanding that court’s decision in Cumbie v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:07 am
See: Peter Dale Scott & Jonathan Marshall, Cocaine Politics: Drugs, Armies, and the CIA in Central America, University of California Press, Berkley and Los Angeles, California, 1998. pp. 76-77. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:22 am
Star Int'l v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 4:32 am
Many states such as Hawaii, and Nevada follow suit and are heavily influenced by California case law when it comes to bad faith actions. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:01 pm
According to the article, In-n-Out claims that Pappas’ use of a “yellow boomerang arrow” in connection with its 3 restaurants located in Texas infringes on In-n-Out’s logo, which it uses on 260 restaurants in California, Nevada, Arizona and Texas. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
In Re v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:16 pm
" Perhaps not surprisingly, two of the states participating in that settlement were hard-sit southwestern neighbors of California's, Nevada and Arizona. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:24 am
See Conte v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Goodrich v. [read post]
