Search for: "California v. Superior Court"
Results 841 - 860
of 5,761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
Superior Court (2002) 29 Cal.4th 262, 269; see also Gilmore Bank v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:45 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 7:45 am
Written as a means of codifying the California Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 11:10 am
Overview of AB 5 and AB 51 AB 5, which codifies the California Supreme Court’s ABC test for independent contractors as set forth in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 11:10 am
Overview of AB 5 and AB 51 AB 5, which codifies the California Supreme Court’s ABC test for independent contractors as set forth in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm
McGinley-Stempel represented the County of San Joaquin in the Superior Court of the State of California in San Joaquin County this summer. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm
McGinley-Stempel represented the County of San Joaquin in the Superior Court of the State of California in San Joaquin County this summer. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:23 am
In 2018, two separate three-judge panels of the Pennsylvania Superior Court (one in Webb Benjamin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 12:45 pm
Superior Court which severely curtailed when employers may use independent contractors. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:14 pm
Bureau of Cannabis Control, slated to be heard in the Superior Court in Fresno in April 2020. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm
The California Supreme Court has implemented this provision using the Hill v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 11:42 am
Superior Court and Court of Appeal, you try and decide this case. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 11:03 am
Superior Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:51 pm
And to be clear, the violated court orders need not be issued by the trial court in the pending action or even by a California court to have the disentitlement doctrine apply. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:43 am
Prior to the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 10:24 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has answered that question with a resounding “No, but…” In Chevalier v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 11:55 am
Superior Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:59 am
Superior Court. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 5:24 am
In Pitzer College v. [read post]