Search for: "California v. United States" Results 841 - 860 of 12,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 5:28 pm by Heidi Meinzer
I will keep watching to see if this case is appealed to the United States Supreme Court, and will keep you posted! [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:48 pm by John Floyd
This definition is drawn from Section 16 of Title 18 of the United States Code. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 8:32 am by Amanda M. Sample and Ellen T. Berge
Last month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California attempted to tackle these questions in response to a motion to dismiss in Della v. [read post]
  While that decision may well be challenged before the California Supreme Court, it only underscores how California employees have an avenue to try to avoid the impact of United States Supreme Court decisions regarding class actions – PAGA claims. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December  in In Re United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Millett will argue on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of California. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Native American Rights Fund
State of California (Gaming Compact; Good Faith Negotiations; Land Into Trust)Sorace v. [read post]
Houston, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, held that borrowers are not intended third-party beneficiaries of the Servicer Participation Agreement and, therefore, lack standing to sue for an alleged breach of the agreement.Benito v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 8:14 pm by Michael O'Hear
 The state’s most prominent victims’ organization, Crime Victims United of California, was quick to condemn the decision and predict the worst for public safety. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:32 pm
Rather than recite the facts of this extremely interesting case, I'll merely cut-and-paste the money quote from Judge Wardlaw's majority opinion (to which Judge Pregerson dissents):"Once again, an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of California overstepped the boundaries of permissible questioning and argument. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:46 am
The United States Federal District Court for the Central District of California recently held that there was no bad faith where the insurer had a reasonable basis upon which to genuinely dispute the insured’s claim. [read post]