Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 12,556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2009, 6:05 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:17 pm
United cites Guz v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 1:48 pm
The California Supreme Court, in Adolph v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:16 am
The court referred to Perez v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
On March 21, the California Supreme Court granted review in Sanchez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:10 pm
The latest California Verdict Search (reports available in paper version only) reports a defense verdict in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California (that's San Diego) in a case called Wawanesa General Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Kumar v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:00 am
United States, No. 2:17-CV-01349, 2022 WL 3567143 (E.D. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 9:32 am
A grand jury indicted Reshon Tolliver of conspiring to distribute marijuana from California to Memphis and of laundering the proceeds of that operation. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:36 pm
United States on 12/3/15. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in the case of Brendlin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In a recent opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed in part the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California’s grant of summary judgment to the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) in Friends of the River v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:15 am
On December 14, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Adaptive Streaming Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
In 2003, California lawmakers enacted Labor Code Section 1102.6, setting forth a framework for whistleblower retaliation claims that varied from the burden-shifting test established by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
The Supreme Court of the United States Blog today presents an enlightening analysis of Monday's decision in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
Nordstrom removed the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, and Gordon subsequently intervened. [read post]
