Search for: "Cato v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2024, 2:14 pm
News Source Vásquez, I., Mitchell, M. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 3:50 pm
In essence, that would be to undo virtually the entire modern “regulatory state. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 9:17 pm
Hans Bader of CEI, at Law and Liberty: As the Washington state supreme court noted in Rickert v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:43 am
Allen (Stetson University College of Law) has published “Of Remedies, Juries and State Regulation of Punitive Damages: The Significance of Philip Morris v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:07 am
Tags: McDonald's, obesity, on TV and radio, publicity Related posts Welcome Lars Larson listeners (0) Pelman v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 3:13 am
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the 11th Circuit held that in calculating compensation, the federal government could take advantage of the fact that the local government's restrictive land use regulations had severely depressed the value of the acquired property. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:14 pm
Antitrust analysis of category management: Conwood v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Cusson v Quan 2007 ONCA 771). [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
Yesterday the court heard argument in Nielsen v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
City of Joliet and Endrew F. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
At ACSBlog, Rick Hasen discusses United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
” Other commentary addresses specific elements of Scalia’s legacy: his originalism, at All Things Considered; his Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, by Jonathan Blanks at Cato at Liberty; his influence on state and local governance, by Lisa Soronen of Knowledge Center for The Counsel of State Governments; his libertarian jurisprudence, by Ilya Shapiro at Reason.com; and his more liberal jurisprudence, by Steven Mazie at Big Think. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 2:28 pm
In Hunt v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:57 am
Briefly: In Forbes, Kashmir Hill discusses a recent decision by a federal magistrate judge who declined to wait for the Court to issue its decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:42 am
Arizona in light of the Court’s recent decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:43 am
Bank of Oregon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Ct. 1367, 1374 (2020), which stated in passing that “the § 315(b)-barred party can join a[n existing IPR] proceeding initiated by another petitioner. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm
The Weyhrauch case tests whether the law applies to a state official if that official did not violate any state law. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:53 am
One might just as well say that an Ex Post Facto Clause argument is reminiscent of Roe v. [read post]
